<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Feartheflames</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feartheflames.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feartheflames.com</link>
	<description>Gaming &#38; Complaining in one simple location</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Diablo 3 Debacle by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.feartheflames.com/post/the-diablo-3-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feartheflames.com/?p=3135#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Wow, talk about a horrible post that rationalises every decision.

The online always argument is folly, ever patched a game that was working to then have it crash? Patches are no reason for this, they worked fine being optional for single player users and would continue to work fine.

The auction stuff some are backing up and rationalizing is really to early to make a call on, it very well could ruin the game completely and put a bad stain on blizzard, only after release will this be known, if to many players feel they have to spend more real cash to play the game at the same level as others doing the same it will certainly ruin it for many.

All that said almost no games anymore have decent co-op models that can played on a lan, which is what I was hoping for in D3.

The  always online thing ruined it for me, StarCraft 2 is so slow booting and connecting even with cable connection for me that it just collects dust, so D3 which was highly anticipated is a no longer a product our home will be purchasing which only costs blizzard 3 sales, insignificant, however I do have to wonder how many sales like this blizzard will lose with these decisions as opposed to how many new sales they will get because of them, to me, it seems they will actually lose profits in the long run.

In the end I am not one of these people who will sit on a high horse claiming that if I had an opportunity to make more money from my work I would not, so I will not call blizzard greedy like so many others garnering images of a fat white man with a cigar behind a desk somewhere, it is their product, and DUH profit is what they are creating it for, however in this case I just am chosing not to purchase it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about a horrible post that rationalises every decision.</p>
<p>The online always argument is folly, ever patched a game that was working to then have it crash? Patches are no reason for this, they worked fine being optional for single player users and would continue to work fine.</p>
<p>The auction stuff some are backing up and rationalizing is really to early to make a call on, it very well could ruin the game completely and put a bad stain on blizzard, only after release will this be known, if to many players feel they have to spend more real cash to play the game at the same level as others doing the same it will certainly ruin it for many.</p>
<p>All that said almost no games anymore have decent co-op models that can played on a lan, which is what I was hoping for in D3.</p>
<p>The  always online thing ruined it for me, StarCraft 2 is so slow booting and connecting even with cable connection for me that it just collects dust, so D3 which was highly anticipated is a no longer a product our home will be purchasing which only costs blizzard 3 sales, insignificant, however I do have to wonder how many sales like this blizzard will lose with these decisions as opposed to how many new sales they will get because of them, to me, it seems they will actually lose profits in the long run.</p>
<p>In the end I am not one of these people who will sit on a high horse claiming that if I had an opportunity to make more money from my work I would not, so I will not call blizzard greedy like so many others garnering images of a fat white man with a cigar behind a desk somewhere, it is their product, and DUH profit is what they are creating it for, however in this case I just am chosing not to purchase it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Diablo 3 Debacle by Lurch Kimded</title>
		<link>http://www.feartheflames.com/post/the-diablo-3-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurch Kimded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feartheflames.com/?p=3135#comment-382</guid>
		<description>I dont see why the offline and online have to be compatible, why not just have a fully offline system, no AH, just, I dont know a game I can play? Have the online stuff, have the AH etc, but allow the option for a  fully offline playthrough, yeah you would lose teh AH, but really that should not be a big deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont see why the offline and online have to be compatible, why not just have a fully offline system, no AH, just, I dont know a game I can play? Have the online stuff, have the AH etc, but allow the option for a  fully offline playthrough, yeah you would lose teh AH, but really that should not be a big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Diablo 3 Debacle by eviloatmeal</title>
		<link>http://www.feartheflames.com/post/the-diablo-3-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>eviloatmeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feartheflames.com/?p=3135#comment-381</guid>
		<description>If your game is an online game and you market it as an online game, then there&#039;s no reason for anyone to complain.

Personally, I prefer &quot;online only&quot; over &quot;online or offline&quot;. It makes life A LOT easier for everyone, especially the developers.

In a game that has a multiplayer economy (auction house), any progress made while not connected to the service is immediately invalidated anyway, due to the fact, as you said, that it is unverifiable. So you would need to play the game in online mode anyway to gain items and resources that would be eligible for trade.

The amount of work that would have to be put into making the offline mode compatible with the online mode is just not worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your game is an online game and you market it as an online game, then there&#8217;s no reason for anyone to complain.</p>
<p>Personally, I prefer &#8220;online only&#8221; over &#8220;online or offline&#8221;. It makes life A LOT easier for everyone, especially the developers.</p>
<p>In a game that has a multiplayer economy (auction house), any progress made while not connected to the service is immediately invalidated anyway, due to the fact, as you said, that it is unverifiable. So you would need to play the game in online mode anyway to gain items and resources that would be eligible for trade.</p>
<p>The amount of work that would have to be put into making the offline mode compatible with the online mode is just not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Diablo 3 Debacle by Kelarik</title>
		<link>http://www.feartheflames.com/post/the-diablo-3-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelarik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feartheflames.com/?p=3135#comment-380</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how I feel about the whole perma-online thing... Diablo II had a system whereby you had a set of characters offline, and a set on Battle.net, and that seemed to work pretty well. That said, I never had an offline character that passed level 20 whereas I had many on Battle.net that were 95+.

Either way, I don&#039;t intend to purchase items on the Auction House with anything other than farmed gold (a few feet for a nice hat), though I plan on taking advantage of anyone that does buy stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how I feel about the whole perma-online thing&#8230; Diablo II had a system whereby you had a set of characters offline, and a set on Battle.net, and that seemed to work pretty well. That said, I never had an offline character that passed level 20 whereas I had many on Battle.net that were 95+.</p>
<p>Either way, I don&#8217;t intend to purchase items on the Auction House with anything other than farmed gold (a few feet for a nice hat), though I plan on taking advantage of anyone that does buy stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Diablo 3 Debacle by Fear</title>
		<link>http://www.feartheflames.com/post/the-diablo-3-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Fear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feartheflames.com/?p=3135#comment-379</guid>
		<description>It sucks yes, but not everything is perfect. Getting 98% of things right, will still piss off 2% of people that yell louder than those 98% because they&#039;re happy with things and don&#039;t feel the need to shout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sucks yes, but not everything is perfect. Getting 98% of things right, will still piss off 2% of people that yell louder than those 98% because they&#8217;re happy with things and don&#8217;t feel the need to shout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Diablo 3 Debacle by Lurch Kimded</title>
		<link>http://www.feartheflames.com/post/the-diablo-3-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurch Kimded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feartheflames.com/?p=3135#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the balanced views, and I can see your views on 1 and 2, and in fact I can now see why it may be a good idea, although still not 100% convinced.

The last one however I still cannot get behind, not all of us have good permanent net connections, and some of game while we are on holiday, traveling, etc. The fact I cannot play a game when I want is a problem and frankly most every other game that has had a &quot;you must be online all the time to play this&quot; has eventually had to remove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the balanced views, and I can see your views on 1 and 2, and in fact I can now see why it may be a good idea, although still not 100% convinced.</p>
<p>The last one however I still cannot get behind, not all of us have good permanent net connections, and some of game while we are on holiday, traveling, etc. The fact I cannot play a game when I want is a problem and frankly most every other game that has had a &#8220;you must be online all the time to play this&#8221; has eventually had to remove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Showtime by teh Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.feartheflames.com/post/showtime/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>teh Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feartheflames.com/?p=2413#comment-347</guid>
		<description>To be fair, three times your weight in sushi would be about a normal sized serving :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, three times your weight in sushi would be about a normal sized serving <img src='http://www.feartheflames.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attention to Detail by Will</title>
		<link>http://www.feartheflames.com/post/attention_to_detail/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feartheflames.com/?p=2304#comment-279</guid>
		<description>I like the new website layout, I&#039;m gonna check out Dead Space also, it looks pretty good.

I should be getting a new PC in a few weeks so then I&#039;ll be able to play games with full settings, I can&#039;t wait. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new website layout, I&#8217;m gonna check out Dead Space also, it looks pretty good.</p>
<p>I should be getting a new PC in a few weeks so then I&#8217;ll be able to play games with full settings, I can&#8217;t wait. <img src='http://www.feartheflames.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

